Dockit • Events & Requests

Dockit is an internal application that supports case managers in handling claimant data, medical record requests, and case preparation for litigation. “Events & Requests” is a redesigned workflow that consolidates legacy tools to streamline how users collect and act on claimant-provided information.

Type

Case Study

Timeframe

3 weeks

Toolkit

Figma, FigJam, Thoughtspot Analytics

Year

2024

Problem

Dockit’s Medical Events and Document Requests workflows were tightly connected but existed in separate areas of the UI, with no shared interaction model. Users had to toggle between screens to reference event data and create accurate document requests, increasing cognitive load, manual tracking, and the risk of delays or errors. This fragmentation slowed record retrieval, a critical step in proving legal claims, costing time, money, and trust.

Solution

We merged Medical Events and Document Requests into a single, contextualized workflow that keeps data input and actions closely aligned. The redesign reduces errors and support burden, accelerates accurate document requests, and scales across different lawsuit types.

Understanding the Project Goals

Business Goals
  • Reduce time to create accurate, complete document requests

  • Decrease internal errors and support burden caused by toggling

  • Improve scalability across different lawsuit types

UX Goals
  • Merge both tools into one seamless, contextualized experience

  • Preserve clarity between data input and action, while improving proximity

  • Allow flexibility for diverse data types and request workflows

  • Clean up the UI for better readability and focus

My Process

As a core designer on this initiative, I worked closely with the other product designer, the PM, and engineers to fully understand the problem space.

Stakeholder Input

  • We spoke with operations specialists who use Dockit daily, gathering key pain points and workflow examples

  • Understanding how both userflows work independently of one another today.

Legacy Code Audit

  • Collaborated with engineers to understand which components could be reused vs. needed rework, and which areas would need check-ins to confirm feasibility due to legacy code.

Takeaways:
  1. Medical Events

    • Where internal users logged specific information given by claimants—such as facility visits, medication usage, job history, etc.—to build a case profile.

  2. Document Requests

    • Where users acted on those events to request official records from medical providers, employers, or other third parties.

  3. Given that record retrieval is critical to proving legal claims, this inefficiency was costing time, money, and trust.

Key Design Decisions

Organized by Facility
  • Events and Requests are grouped by facility to reflect how requests are handled operationally

  • Claimants often visit multiple locations for treatment. This structure helps retrieval specialists stay organized

Stacked Layout: Events Above Requests
  • Each facility section displays Events first

  • Below is a Requests table showing what’s been sent.

    • This reinforces the cause and effect logic: Add Events → Send Request

Event Details in a Drawer
  • Clicking an event opens a right-side drawer

  • Drawer shows a structured, read-only summary of injury, facility, physician, care type, and notes

  • Event status is clearly marked (“Ongoing”, “Ready for Request”, “Complete”)

Dual Action Path
  • Users can:

    • Add new Events

    • Send Requests directly from the table

  • Enables flexibility and reduces unnecessary navigation

Scalable Table Design
  • High-level overview in tables for scanning

  • Deeper detail on demand in drawers

  • Future-proofed to support additional metadata

Outcomes

  1. Improved Workflow Efficiency

    • Users can complete the end-to-end task in one place, reducing toggling and rework

  2. Cleaner Handoff to Operations

    • Better event/request linkage reduced back-and-forth communication internally

  3. Positive Team Feedback

    • Operations team members noted how much easier it was to manage cases without jumping screens.

      • “This makes my life so much easier”

  4. Scalability Win

    • The new layout structure is extensible for future case types

  5. Engineers were able to preserve important legacy logic while benefiting from a restructured interface

3 min read